Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Outrage

Self-rightness, altruism, and arrogance, are cloaking devices used by this current group of congressional democrats and this temporary President. Hidden in all this hoopla is their lust for more power, more control, and a belief their legacy will be "the ones that changed this nation."

Anything less then outrage will not get Tea mission done. Wheels of time are turn and the polling reports look good…. However, in this world, 6 or 7 weeks is a life time. So much more to be done and so little time.

We need more drum beaters: More street walking: Larger groups in the streets: and many more loud talkers. So many of our congressional people lie, cheat, and they steal from us and our President misrepresents what is happening with his programs daily. Our President says his programs are going just fine.

Example one: New high-risk insurance pool draws only a few applicants

Few Iowans are showing interest in a new state health insurance program for people with medical conditions, such as cancer, diabetes or high blood pressure. Such high-risk pools are among the first programs to take effect under the federal health reform law. When the Iowa pool opened early last month, there was some concern that it would be unable to meet demand. Federal experts estimated that 34,500 Iowans would qualify, but the federal government provided enough money to cover only about 975 of them.

However, the program has received just 32 applications so far. Cecil Bykerk, executive director of the effort, said he was surprised by the lack of interest.

Example two: Race to the Top

White House perverts Race to the Top results for political gain -- A study by the American Enterprise Institute alleges "there is a strong correlation between states that won Race to the Top and states that are of great interest to the White House this election season," reports The Daily Caller's Amanda Carey. "In other words, states with contested races that threaten Democrats got put at the top of the list regardless of any progress in their schools systems." These allegations are contained in a study put together by AEI fellow and University of Arkansas professor Daniel Bowen. According to Carey, Bowen "conducted an independent study of the states that entered RTT, based on their sores from round one and the political circumstances. Bowen found that it’s quite possible political interests influenced RTT winners. Not only that, but in some cases, the status of a state’s Congressional and gubernatorial races accounted for a 77 point increase in final scores (out of 500). In Washington, D.C.’s case, for example, those 77 points were enough to move it from its position as dead last in round one, to first place in round two." How's that for ALL morally challenged vote sellers to the person. Selling out to assure support from special interest and party support. (Just ask Lisa and Blanche if this really works in political world of the Tea Party.)

The good old boy system is alive and well in the national medias' world and they will hide all the short comings and misrepresentations and report the Teasers are red neck racist out to destroy the nation.

This is a war and a very special war. There are no battle lines. There are only limited boundaries easily crossed by truth. Truth as to what these entrenched congress people have done and just how, what they have done, will effect our nation and each citizen into the future. Loud passionate voices cross these limited boundaries.

These last few weeks needs to be a street fight. No hold bared and no quarter. Life or death of a free nation is a stake.

Below is a link to one of many of loud talkers, out of Texas, who cross boundaries. Clear on what's at stake and passionate about the outcome.

Just click to view.






Come November…Come November come with us and let us elect new leaders that understand they must listen to the people who they work for.

Visit us at The Oxford Tea Party.


Ron

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Waive bye, bye to Lisa and Blanche

Great ability without discretion comes almost invariably to a tragic end."
Leon-Michel Gambetta

Winning primaries get a candidates names on the ballot but no cigar. Winning elections get the candidates in congress….. Obvious…..Efforts must be expanded. No kicking back, no let down, no vacations. The hardest part of this TEA mission is still to come...

“A man’s admiration for absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville

Tocqueville came to our shores, saw the people, and grasped clearly who we are…His writings have stood the test of time. The spirit of the people that he saw and understood still exist and has culminated, once again, in "Our Tea Party."

Free people….God help the ones that tamper with our freedom and safety.

This day has started early, as usual, but what is not usual is there is a good deal of "good news" to share. Below is the up-to-the-minute report from the RedState daily report along with some ideas from the Heritage Foundation that our NEW congress needs to act
on.

Hay Mitch, what's happening?

Asked by RedState:

Knee Capping Mitch McConnell: Lisa Murkowski concedes to Joe Miller
Lisa Murkowski has conceded the senate primary in Alaska.(Sarah Palin endorsed Joe Miller.)

This news is bigger than Lisa Murkowski. While establishment Republicans will bristle at it, this is a near total kneecapping of Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, not to mention another rejection of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

Consider this inside baseball fact: McConnell has chosen as his loyal lieutenants at the leadership table Robert Bennett (R-UT), Judd Gregg (R-NH), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), and Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX).

Judd Gregg is retiring and McConnell sought to replace him with Trey Grayson of Kentucky. Grayson, however, lost to Rand Paul in the Kentucky GOP Primary. Conservatives threw Bob Bennett out at the Utah GOP convention, replacing him with firebrand conservative Mike Lee.

Now Lisa Murkowski is defeated, like Bob Bennett, by conservative activists concerned by the fiscal drift of the Republican Party and the overall direction of the American republic.

McConnell is and has been seen for years as a leader in the GOP. The party put him in charge on the National Republican Senatorial Committee. The committee identifies new potential candidates and offer support and guidance to the incumbent senators who are running for reelection. IF we look closely at his choices for members of the committee he is in charge of should we not question his sanity or should we wonder HOW he, as a major leader in the GOP, be so out of touch with the voters and worry even more about all of the other leaders of the GOP.

Consider another fact: Conservatives, led by Jim DeMint and Sarah Palin, are potentially creating the most conservative Senate Republican Conference in the last thirty or so years: Sharron Angle, Ken Buck, Mike Lee, Joe Miller, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and Pat Toomey will be joining Jim DeMint, Tom Coburn, and David Vitter. The major GOP leadership did not get behind any of these candidates.

TEN Senators is what is needed. It seems the House is going to become a conservative House. What can "we" do to come up with TWO more Senators? Eight of the conservative senate candidates are doing well at the moment….

Consider this an open thread and an opportunity for Red State America to suggest further ideas to forward the cause of freedom, limited government, free markets and a strong national defense.

Here are a few of the concrete ideas for change from The Heritage Foundation and RedState offer up:

Cap Federal Spending - It is important for Conservatives to come up with a plan to stop the overspending in Washington, D.C. that has lead to a $13.3 trillion national debt. “place a firm cap on overall federal spending, and limit future year-to-year growth to inflation plus population growth. Federal spending is on an unsustainable trajectory because we lack a mechanism that forces Congress to live within agreed upon spending limits. A binding cap will force lawmakers to make the tough decisions required to get us back to fiscal sanity.” There are other great ideas in cutting federal spending and your ideas would be much appreciated."

Put Entitlement Programs Under the Budget - According to The Heritage Foundation, “the middle class retirement programs, Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare, will cause federal spending to jump by half, from the historical average of twenty percent of the economy to thirty percent by 2033. This tsunami of spending is a major threat to limited government because it runs on auto-pilot with automatic increases locked in by each program’s governing laws. While other programs are constrained through annual budgets, entitlements get the first call on resources.” Solutions for America urges policy makers to consider “require(ing) the Big Three entitlement programs— Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security—to live within firm, congressionally approved budgets. If Congress is ever to control spending, it must end the era of open-ended entitlements. Currently, Big Three spending is on autopilot—increasing automatically year after year. Entitlement spending must be brought into the congressional budgetary process. Lawmakers should establish a five-year budget for these programs and include protective mechanisms, such as triggers, that will automatically keep spending within the congressionally approved limits.”

Do Red Staters have any other ideas on how to reform entitlement programs?

Revive Federalism- ObamaCare imposes a federal mandate that all Americans in the 50 states buy health insurance. This is a clear violation of the idea of federalism. Solutions for America argues that “the federal government has usurped the states’ traditional role in areas such as transportation, education, health (especially Medicaid), homeland security, and law enforcement. Washington must cede vast swatches of its policymaking authority—and the funding that goes with it—to states willing to reassume leadership in these areas.” Congress needs to consider ideas that will restore the traditional role of the states.

Loan Welfare Money to Able Bodied Recipients - As Robert Rector and Chuck Donovan have written for The Heritage Foundation that Congress needs to take another run at Welfare Reform. “Why not treat a portion of welfare assistance to able-bodied adults as a loan to be repaid, rather than as a free gift from the taxpayers? Such a policy change would reduce the moral hazard associated with dependency, while providing temporary help to those in need. Clearly, welfare as we knew it did not end, as so many of us had hoped 14 years ago (the 1996 Welfare Reform Law). Adjusting for inflation, total welfare spending is nearly twice what it was before 1996.” Solutions for America argues to “limit the unsustainable growth of welfare spending, and require recipients to give something back. Aggregate welfare spending now approaches $1 trillion annually and does more harm than good. Congress must treat all 71 means-tested welfare programs holistically, as a discrete category of federal spending, and cap annual year-to-year welfare spending growth at inflation. This will force Congress to consider new approaches that could actually help the poor surmount poverty. To this end, Congress should require able-bodied adults to treat a portion of certain welfare benefits as loans to be repaid rather than as an open-ended grant from taxpayers. Also, Congress should study how many of those 71 means-tested welfare programs are redundant and eliminate the ones that allow for double dipping. Seem reasonable?

Stop Overpaying Federal Workers- Federal employees are overpaid at a time when the private sector is experiencing great pain. Solutions for America argues, “pay federal workers wages and benefits comparable to what their counterparts earn in the private sector. Federal employee compensation is far too generous. Total compensation—hourly wages plus benefits—is 30–40% above that of comparable private sector workers. By bringing federal compensation in line with market rates, Congress would save taxpayers approximately $47 billion a year.” James Sherk of The Heritage Foundation recommends the following: Abolish the General Schedule and implementing market-based performance pay; Expand the contracting out of non-essential tasks to the private sector; Reduce the generosity of the benefits the federal government provides; and end restrictions on dismissing underperforming federal employees, thus incentivizing increased productivity. These seem like some common sense solutions to the problem of federal bureaucrats making more than the average American in the private sector.

Keep Taxes Low - Do not implement a Value Added Tax, a Carbon Tax, nor the Obama Tax Increases of 2011. Solutions for America suggests that “tax increases, especially those loaded on small-business owners (our most productive and entrepreneurial individuals), are counterproductive at any time. To raise taxes during a recession is a recipe for crippling economic growth and job creation. Maintaining the tax burden at its current level is the least Congress should do.” Red Staters must have other suggested taxes to reduce or abolish.

Implement a Pro-Growth Strategy- President Obama’s $862 billion monstrosity stimulus Plan has lead to a $1 billion earmark for a special project in Illinois and a program to study the effects of Cocaine on Monkeys. A real strategy to encourage investment and real job creation would be to reduce government interference in the free market. Solutions for America argues for policies that ”encourage investment and job creation. Reduce the top tax rate on corporate earnings—currently the second highest among all industrial nations—and let businesses immediately deduct investments in new plant and equipment. These two changes to the tax code will unleash the most productive investments and create the most private sector jobs. Specifically, lawmakers should align the top rate on corporate earnings to those that prevail in our 30 largest trading partners—approximately 25%.” This is a target rich environment for pro-growth ideas that retreat from the President’s failed economic policies.

Stop Taxing Seniors- Why do seniors have to keep paying taxes as they get older? The federal government should not maintain policies that essentially force older Americans to retire when they still can work. Here is another solution for America. “As part of the broader effort to reform entitlement programs, seniors who wish to work beyond retirement age should be freed from the burden of paying Social Security payroll taxes. Employers willing to retain or hire these older workers also should be exempt from paying the employer share of the FICA tax.” This would be a stimulus program for older Americans and an idea that makes sense.

Peace Through Strength - President Ronald Reagan promoted the idea of maintaining a strong military as a means to protect American citizens. Solutions for America argues that ”a robust military is the surest way to deter aggression and reinforce U.S. diplomacy. To accomplish this, the Pentagon procurement holiday must end. Congress must refurbish our armed forces, especially our depleted Navy fleet and vital missile defenses.” Congress needs to make sure that our defense infrastructure stays strong in the face of emerging threats from rogue nations and entities.

Well, these ideas would be a really good start. Better still all these ideas are pointing in the right direction. Given where we are today it is clear, if we are not clear, with our elected congressional employees they will run amuck. So as this campaign rolls along over these next few weeks we must tell these candidates what we will expect of them IF they want our votes.

Fifty nine days is not much time but the rolling thunder that is moving across the country foretells a devastating storm for the liberals in both of the national parties. Just look at how out of touch Mitch McConnell has been along with the majority of the establishment Republican leaders. Out of touch? They are so focused on getting all the "good old boys and girls" reelected they cannot/will not look at their behavior. Behavior that has weaken what has been thought to be "the" conservative party. Such reckless arrogance.


Fifty nine days may not seem like much time BUT watch what the CURRENT CONGRESS can get passed in the next few weeks "to get the economy moving" with the hope of buying the "undecided" voters.

Come November…Come November come with us and let us elect new leaders that understand they must listen to the people who they work for.

If you have any patience's left after this long wordy missive click on the link below and listen to a really fun song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIPoPw9zgvQ

Ron

http://theoxfordteaparty.blogspot.com/



Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Economy - Fear - America?

Its really easy to hate the news media…. Each and everyone one of them along with their programming philosophy of "if it bleeds it leads." There are so many things that get lost in this kind of programming as well as all the biases that can be hidden.

We are not a nation of lost souls. We are not a nation that is drowning. Many are unemployed BUT not all. Everyone who didn't have health insurance was getting health care without Obamacare. We can pay our debts and we have too much of it. We can stay out of wars and still be a powerful military nation. We can have a government that is responsive to the needs and wishes of our citizens.

This economy cannot be called "the best of times" but we have had hard time before. We need to keep this in mind and we need to be reminded of this reality often. The nattional media is selling voters a plate of fear.

In this The Oxford Tea Party posting we are including an article that is just such a reminder written by: Alex Daley and Doug Hornig. This is a long article but important in it message.

Posted on the JohnMauldin@InvestorsInsight.com

America's Greatest Wealth Creation Engine

To judge by the headlines, you might think we Americans have lost the ability to create wealth.

The stock market is floundering, even after flat lining for a decade. The overall economy is in the doldrums. Domestic heavy industry has all but disappeared. Real estate has crashed. The airlines, the automakers, the banks, all have gone to Washington, begging bowl in hand, demanding handouts from a government that, like the average citizen, is drowning in debt.

Bad news abounds, no doubt. Yet, amid all the doom and gloom, it's easy to overlook the fact that the real engine of growth in the modern world is chugging right along.

Easy because many investors have turned their attention intently in the direction of interest rates and housing starts and the pontifications of Ben Bernanke, failing to notice that one of the markets they left behind is now leaving them behind.


Over the past decade, while the overall market was weakly limping along, these companies have been steadily growing revenues, adding jobs, and spewing profits. At the same time as brash startups were reinventing news, entertainment, communication, medicine, and virtually every other aspect of our work and home lives, promising to deliver still more growth even in this weak economy.



We're talking about technology, of course.

Technological development is impersonal and implacable. It cares not who controls Congress or chairs the Fed. It has been the stuff of American life for a century - from the assembly line to the smartphone. Most importantly, it's done what a successful segment of the economy is supposed to do, bring about prosperity by adding to the tangible wealth of the country.

And it did so the old-fashioned way, by creating things useful to society.
It made money for the innovators who were able to parlay their intellectual property into products that people wanted to buy. It made money for the people who worked for the innovators. It made money for companies, and their employees, that increased efficiency by integrating technological advances into their businesses. And it made money for investors who backed the leading lights in the field.

Tech, in short, has not only raised everyone standard of living, it has created wealth. Lots of wealth. And it continues to do so today, right through all of our economic turmoil.

One incredibly simple measure of the prosperity created is market capitalization, the sum total of the wealth held by investors.

Thirty years ago, in 1980, the entire stock market boasted only three mega-companies, i.e., those with market caps in excess of $40 billion (the equivalent of $100 billion today, in inflation-adjusted dollars): Exxon, IBM, AT&T.

Those three are still with us, and all still boast $100B+ caps. But they are joined by no fewer than 21 other U.S. companies. Taken together, the 24 have a collective market cap of $3.8 trillion.

Technology allowed this to happen.

Consider that in 1980, five of the top 24 - Apple (#2), Microsoft (3), Cisco (15), Google (19), and Oracle (23), tech companies all - either hadn't gone public or didn't even exist. Intel (21) was around, but almost no one had noticed. IBM (7) was an industry leader then, but only as the primary maker of clunky mainframes. Hewlett-Packard (24) had yet to introduce either inkjet or laser printers. Walmart (4) was still dreaming of the ultra-efficient, automated distribution system that would transform its business.

The contrast between the old and the new could not be more stark.
From the 1980s to today, General Motors has slid steadily downward, racking up billions in losses that culminated in a painful bankruptcy/bailout. Over the same period, a handful of geeks from Seattle grew their dorm-room startup, Microsoft, into a global software empire with over $60 billion per year in revenue. Along the way, the company turned four employees into billionaires and an estimated 12,000 into millionaires, while amassing some $250 billion in equity for shareholders.

In 1990, Countrywide Credit emerged as the nation's leading mortgage banker. That same year, networking company Cisco Systems went public at a split-adjusted $0.08 per share and helped to usher in the Internet age with its routers and switches. Countrywide disappeared into Bank of America in 2008, after its credit rating was slashed to "junk" by Standard & Poor's; Cisco now employs over 65,000 people and has created over $120 billion in market value.

Over the past 10 years, the airlines posted loss after loss, received numerous government bailouts, and saw the XAL airline stock index fall from 175 to 35, erasing billions in shareholder value. Meanwhile, a little Silicon Valley firm with a rather silly name, Google, built a $25 billion a year advertising behemoth and rocketed its market cap to over $140 billion.

And the list goes on.

Dell computers are still widely known for their "Dude, you're getting a Dell!" ad campaign, but it's been more like, "Dude you're getting $23 billion since your 1988 coming-out party!" Global electronic storage leader EMC has gone from a tiny outfit when it went public in 1986 to $37 billion today. And that's not including its subsidiary VMware, spun off on its own and now valued at some $25 billion. Since 2000, biotechnology leader Celgene has added over $20 billion in wealth to its shareholders' pockets.

It isn't just the behemoths, either. Smaller companies across the industry, and straight through America's supposed lost decade, have granted themselves licenses to print money. Since its 2002 IPO, for example, Netflix has built up a $5.6 billion market cap. Computer graphics chip maker NVIDIA has conjured $5.8 billion in new wealth since its 1999 public debut. Boating equipment supplier Garmin reinvented itself last decade through GPS navigation systems, to the tune of $5.8 billion.

Even today, as we struggle through what many have labeled the next great depression, technology keeps on creating fortunes. Founded in 2000 and IPO'd in 2009, restaurant software pioneer OpenTable has put on weight to the tune of nearly $1 billion in market cap and is still growing furiously. Network security outfit Fortinet, also founded in the doldrums of 2000 and taken public just last year, has secured some $1.1 billion for its shareholders and the fast-growing new market it created.

Sure, the easy-money days were 1980-2000, when the tech-heavy NASDAQ Index soared from around 160 to 4,700. That's a stunning compound annual growth rate of 18.5% for 20 years. If you managed to ride the wave trough to peak, every dollar you threw at the NASDAQ turned into 30. And the beauty of it was, you didn't have to know silicon from soy sauce. You could have put your investment cash into almost anything.

No longer. In 2000, the balloon popped. The dotcom bust slammed into the market, the economy went into recession, and the era of indiscriminate investing came to an abrupt and well-deserved end. The NASDAQ Index remains at just about half the high-water mark established ten years ago.

Small wonder so many have lost all faith in technology. Which is too bad. Because technology is an unstoppable force. It doesn't grind to a halt, or even slow down, just because it falls out of favor on Wall Street. Inventors continue to innovate, entrepreneurs continue to market the resultant products, and consumers continue to buy.

Moreover, although the train has been rolling right along, it's far from too late to get on board. Savvy tech investors may have to put in the time and effort to sort the good companies from the bad this time around, thankfully. But there are more opportunities than ever to use the sector to build personal wealth.


Some look at technology and see only the downsides. The oil spills, the loss of privacy, the ugly machinery of war. But we recognize that technological advances have, for the most part, made our lives longer, better, healthier, more comfortable, and more fun. There's no reason to believe that that trend won't continue. In fact, the biotech and nanotech revolutions now just getting underway promise to usher in a renaissance of such magnitude that it will likely make all our previous techno-magic seem like simple card tricks. (Although we will need to refrain from blowing ourselves up in the interim.)

So the answer to the original question is: no, we haven't lost our ability to create wealth. At least not in one critical area for the future. And with every conceivable measure showing the rate of technological change increasing exponentially, we have accelerated it.

Looking ahead, the eightfold increase in mega-caps since 1980 is likely to seem paltry thirty years from now. More foreigners will enter the ranks; many more, since China and India presently contribute fewer than two dozen to the world's 500 largest companies. And it's dead certain that the market leaders in 2040 will include many firms that today are no more than a gleam in a high schooler's eye.


As an investor, cashing in on the tech boom of the past three decades has meant finding the most promising young companies at the beginning of their trip skyward. That will also be the case in the next three.

Only the names will change.

BY: Alex Daley and Doug Hornig

A few hundred years ago a man decided to produce pulleys for the glut of English ships on an assembly line which was successful and since that time business folks around the world have worked with one goal in mind which is to make it (what ever it is) smarter, faster, and better. Are "they" still doing it today? YES. Will "they" continue tomorrow? YES. The quest for a better mouse trap will never end but can be interfered with by government through burdensome taxes and regulations. Which is what is happening in our country.

When we get a new congress in 2011 we need to know just what we want them to do. Business is the heart beat of our economy. Business is not the enemy. Business is the life's blood no matter what government and the media says.

How sad it is that we have elected ninety-eight percent of our government officials and these officials have never had the responsibility of signing pay checks for employees. What could we be thinking?

Can we expect inexperienced government officials to lead us out of this difficult economic times? (Getting elected is not the same as meeting payroll every friday.)

We start in November… We need control in both houses….The polls are looking better… Now is not the time to take a vacation….

Ron

http://theoxfordteaparty.blogspot.com/


.

Leadership

We are sending posting this poem without comment because it need none.

The following is a poem written by Judge Roy Moore from Alabama . Judge Moore was sued by the ACLU for displaying the Ten Commandments in his courtroom foyer.. He has been stripped of his judgeship and now they are trying to strip his right to practice law in Alabama ! The judge's poem sums it up quite well..


America the beautiful,or so you used to be
Land of the Pilgrims' pride;
I'm glad they'll never see.

Babies piled in dumpsters,
Abortion on demand,
Oh, sweet land of liberty;
your house is on the sand.

Our children wander aimlessly
poisoned by cocaine
choosing to indulge their lusts,
when God has said abstain

From sea to shining sea,
our Nation turns away
From the teaching of God's love
and a need to always pray

We've kept God in ourtemples,
how callous we have grown.
When earth is but His footstool,
and Heaven is His throne.

We've voted in a government
that's rotting at the core,
Appointing Godless Judges;
who throw reason out the door,

Too soft to place a killer
in a well deserved tomb,
But brave enough to kill a baby
before he leaves the womb

You think that God's not angry,
that our land's a moral slum?
How much longer will He wait
before His judgment comes?

How are we to face our God,
from whom we cannot hide?
What then is left for us to do,
but stem this evil tide?

If we who are His children,
will humbly turn and pray;
Seek His holy face
and mend our evil way:

Then God will hear from Heaven;
and forgive us of our sins,
He'll heal our sickly land
and those who live within.

But, America the Beautiful,
If you don't - then you will see,
A sad but Holy God
with draw His hand from Thee..

~~Judge Roy Moore~~


Well, clearly this leader has not thrown in the towel.

Come November…Come November come with us and let us elect new leaders.

Ron

http://theoxfordteaparty.blogspot.com/